We did it! And we were not thwarted by the electoral system this time. Now we just have to wait until January to see what this man can do.
This was a good election in so many respects. A few downsides from my view are Gordon Smith beating out Jeff Merkley for senate (Oregon), and the passing of California's Prop 8, reinstating a ban on gay marriage.
Nevertheless, there is much to celebrate, including great results on the Oregon statewide ballot measures. Of particular interest, we voted in opposition of a "top two" open primary system in the state. This is an interesting concept that seems like a chance to get candidates who better represent that voters into the general election. But, it would actually cause parties to split votes among a slew of candidates in the primary, potentially advancing only candidates that are supported by a unified minority. Two general elections is not good for minor party candidates, or major party candidates either. So, good job, Oregonians, on voting that down.
I'm also impressed to see that school bonds passed in many places, demonstrating voters' commitment to education and children even during an economic disaster.
Voter registration and turnout was great, so I hope that continues for near-future elections.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
"But, it would actually cause parties to split votes among a slew of candidates in the primary, potentially advancing only candidates that are supported by a unified minority. Two general elections is not good for minor party candidates, or major party candidates either."
It's called democracy. It means that everyone, including independents would have a chance to vote for the candidate of the choice at the point of the process (the first round) when it actually counts. Why are the parties so scared of democracy?
Gwen
www.independentvoting.org
Thanks for your comment.
I would support an open primary, but not a top-two primary system.
Currently, independent voters can register for any party for any primary election (not perfect, of course, since top choices may be of different parties in different races).
I would definitely be in favor of an open primary system, in which voters can vote for any candidate, but that parties continue to each advance one candidate to the general election.
I was initially excited about the top-two primary system, but eventually realized that it will give voters fewer choices in the general election.
Like I wrote before, the top-two system would not promote minor party candidates and could leave a majority of voters with two candidates they never supported.
Post a Comment